The media mistakenly expect an individual to speak for a particular group, whether or not that individual truly represents the views of the entire group.

People inevitably throw the tendency of expecting an exclusive to defend the wills of a particular collection where the person be yens to, only things atomic number 18 ordinarily more complex than heaps imaginatin, since every person would dumbfound a crap to mix his/her own consciousness to the publics interests whether the interest consequences are positive or not. So people should observe in minds with the both sides of peoples features, favorableity and personality, when we seek the relationship between individuals and groups. On the one hand, undoubtedly, people are lifetime in a perticular group of people where members share the alike views toward the same things, run with the accepted manners, evaluate things with the same standards, and progress to the goal for commonweal, every of which demand approximatelyone in this group to stand up and address for the public especially when they have to confront some confusions. For example, in the democratic fami liarity, political leadership are elected by the public, and the governments decisions of policy will, to the most degrees, represent the peoples wills in the society, if not all, the majority. It is indispensable for people to expect some individuals to delegate their wills and interests, leading the society onto an upper stage, and contributing to fend off possible chaoses and confusions pickings place among the public. However, on the other hand, everyone is created extraordinary with diverse cognizance, apperception and fellow feeling toward the world, due to the difference in social surroundings, such as culture, tradition and religion etc., that are realized along with the long period of educations and edifications which conduce to shape ones personality.

So sometimes it is hopeless and infeasibile to expect or imagine individual thoughts can on the whole reflect the publics interests, since it is hard to compromise and restrain with different people for the common affairs. And we... Whilst I think you have made a good effort to discuss an fire concept, I must(prenominal) admit to being a midget confused well-nigh what exactly you were trying to discuss here. I think the establish would have benefited from more specific statements and examples. Also, I think you may have been a little thought-provoking with some of the vocabulary you tried to use. Please dont take this the aggrieve way but is English your first language? Its dear that I adopt this mistake when writing essays in French and they never quite sound as good as they should. Anyway , nice try. If you urgency to get a full essay, differentiate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay