Agfunds Case

INTRODUCTIONAgfinances is a financial serfeeblenesss company based in Houston, employ to providing account¬ing ser depravitys for farmers and farmer-owned cooperatives. AgFunds is a large investment funds firm, which relies on their competitive training programs to produce safey licensed, pay top gross sales representatives. Cynthia Mitchell was once cardinal of the outperform trainees, and is now wiz of AgFunds regional regularize managers. Cynthia, recruited by Peter Jones, the Houston-based regional vice president who oversaw eight s divulgehern districts, was expected to revive the atomic number 18 district. PROBLEM DEFINITIONThe district, which Cynthia was chosen to manage, had been losing customers for 15 years. According to observers the sales self-coloured point thither wasnt the main cause of the problem; just now kind of the fact that its been poorly managed for as well long. Cynthia Mitchell needs a human dynamo sales rep to help her win back customers i n a conservative region of the South. Steve Ripley just expertness be the right guy for the labor. Hes AgFunds top trainee: talented, ambitious, intelligent, charming. Cynthia?s colleagues insinuated that that aptitude non be in the best interest of the firm because of the racial issues involved. Should she hire him - and possibly set him up to poop out - in an inhospitable district?ANALYSISAgFunds had just promoted, Cynthia Mitchell ? a sales reps, to the district manager of the Arkansas branch. The Arkansas firm was in a slump and was in dire need of change. Cynthia assessed the station on that point and came up with a plan of action. A line divisor of that plan was to get her hands on a powerhouse sales rep. So she was intrigued when she came across Steve Ripley credentials, this years top trainee, who was surprisingly simmer down available. Cynthia addressed the issue with her superior, who did not sh ar in her excitement. He suggested that Steve dexterity not be the best fit for the job: Hes Afri plunder Amer! i send away in a company whose customer base is mostly conservative and white. This make Cynthia uncertain and strained her to recall her own experiences at AgFunds - shed been rejected for a survey in a territory that was deemed too unfriendly to distaff sales representatives. So she was faced with a difficult termination: Should she ignore her customers biases and hire Steve, possibly background him up to fail? Or would it perhaps be interrupt to let Steve waiting until a friendlier opportunity presents itself?

In Cynthia?s first years at AgFunds she experienced struggles similar to what Steve might face. Work ing closely with her would relinquish him to see the possibilities for success, providing him with motivation. There was not a better person for him to work under if he was to succeed at AgFunds. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONSIn the end, it?s Cynthia and Steve?s decision. Cynthia should determine if the pros exceed the cons?Steve Ripley is the most qualified applicant, he is highly motivated and there is much that he can accomplish there. Together they can make the necessary adjustments needed. It would be a fair mint off, to take advantage of Steve?s strengths to accomplish company goals. And at the same time flop Steve the opportunity of a lifetime. As long as agreements are made beforehand and Steve is conscious(predicate) of the possible objections that may amount as a progeny of him working there. BIBLIOGRAPHY1.http://www.microcreditsummit.org/enews/2005-04_plenary_02.hypertext markup language2. http://www.change-management-consulting.com/html/ ethics_process.html If you want to! get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay