“Let America Be America Again” and “Harlem

Compare and Contrast         Since the beginning of his life, Langston Hughes, knew that he was going to be something. His comp unriv altogetherednt to the Harlem renaissance will not be forgotten. Nor will the focal point he consumptions jazz, blues, and gospel music to revel in how raise blacks tolerate really come. I will equation and state apart two of his some popular works, allow the States Be the States once again and Harlem.                  To understand the compare and contrast you moldiness first have a brief, yet detailed displacement reaction of two of the works. let us first approach permit the States Be the States once to a greater extent, Hughes government note is likely the first issue aimed. His tone has an understood wisdom that the States was lay off for those who werent black. Although it has a kind of whiny tone, it isnt. Hughes has been wipe out down, barely the event that he is a su rvivor right smart that he wont give up. He starts monstrous in telegraph wire 2 stating that the States was cr feed ined for the sole designer of freedom. He in any case implies in line 3 and 4 that our country was founded for the sole purpose of freedom. In accompaniment and I quote, allow it be the pioneer on the plain quest a home where he himself is free. Hughes was a piece of music of many talents and one of them was his perceptiveness. A perfect example is in stanza 25, where he states, Of dog eat dog, of mighty crush the easy. In essence he said its kill or be killed, survival of the fittest. You would mean that e very(prenominal)one would agree, but thence once more(prenominal) a accord of common sense has been lost. Or manifestly the fact that the States is apathetic and cares only for one person, themselves. He then goes on to describe that he is, or our lavation is, poor and uneducated, etc yet the simple fact remains that we may be get the better of down, but we are far from deathli! ke (he now is disquisition of every race that is or has been persecuted in America). In stanza 60 the closely basic and one of the most important of human race emotions shines through Hughes. America never was America to me, And yet I swear this oath-America will be! What is the most basic instinct, survival of cable.         Now let us approach, Harlem which is one of my fiberl favorites because of its realism. create verbally nearly a decade subsequent and in a completely different tone this poem can bring forth makeers who arent used to Hughes use of stuffy wisdom. This poem has eleven, dissipated to the point, short lines. Each one asks a different read/write head, to understand it we will break it down into five-spot different examinations. The first is What happens to a dream deferred? This caput has a variety of different answers depending on the person. Since it is pen for everyone to enjoy or not, the answer must be whatever you think . In another(prenominal) wrangle there is no wrong answer or you could retributive play it safe and say that it is rhetorical. The second head word is more descriptive because it partly answers the first question. Hughes asks and I quote, Does it slip a demeanor dry up like a raisin in the insolate? The use of adjectives and the metaphor suggests that he is a throw togetherg you the endorser if that is how your dreams, of course the ones that turn int come true, die. The third question is more to my liking. He asks, Or fester like a sore-And then pop off? This one is pretty obvious, he is solely asking if your dreams stay fresh leading you on and then dump you at the prevail second. Hence fester (leading you on) and run (dump you at the last second). The quarter question is another rhetorical question, Does it stink like filthy meat? Or cheek and sugar over-like a honied sweet? Only the reader can answer that question since it depends on your own persona an d so on. The last question is set apart from the res! t. This is where he reaches his breaking point and comes break through of the trance that so aptly named poetry. To understand this question you would have to ask the very man that wrote it.

        Now we can compare and contrast Let America Be America Again and Harlem. First address the tones of both poems. In Let America Be America Again His prose isnt exactly bitter, but its not happy either. In Harlem it is completely the opposite, because it is written ten long time after it is believable that something happened to him to change his tone and his way of writing. When he writes in Harlem his use of adjectives is qu ite an abrasive. As it seemed to me he was kind of irritated anyways, so in a way it worked itself out. In the first three stanzas Hughes is celebrating the dream. He also identifies the dream with pioneers and with kings. simply in Harlem the dream is explosive and decrepit. The abstract design in Let America Be America Again is more or less acceptance. He accepts the fact that things are the way they are and strives to change it. However in Harlem his concept sounds rather pessimistic. But thats only to the untrained and ignorant, because despite the fact that his tone is dark doesnt immoral that he has disposed(p) up on life. Perhaps he finally see that the good doesnt outweigh the bad. In Let America... his interpreter isnt singular, but the unheard voices of all races who have been persecuted because of their skin color. In Harlem its just one voice that seems to ask so many questions. Just like in Let America... he doesnt allow himself to be restrain by h is questions.         In the end Langs! ton Hughes was a man changed by time. The fact that Harlem differs from Let America Be America Again means that Hughes further grew up. The use of realism in both poems helps convey the world-wide idea of what happens in the real origination when dreams are crushed. If you unavoidableness to get a full essay, narrate it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay